REQUEST FORM

RNY Gastrik Bypass

RNY Gastric Bypass was one of the most commonly used and gold standard methods in the United States. But for the last 2 years, Tube has been behind stomach surgery. The biggest advantage is that the body is not removed from the body at all, but the change of the normal path of the eye is a serious disadvantage. Also, if stones are formed in the bile ducts, the chance of getting them by mouth through the endoscopic route is lost. A large part of the diverticulum and twelve fingernails can not be examined by endoscopically after the gastritis bypass operation. It is not true that the RNY gastritis bypass surgery is losing weight better than Tube stomach surgery and has been weak for longer. Studies show that the results are very close to each other in terms of weight loss.

RNY gastritis Bypass has its own complications such as intestinal knot necrosis. The tube for diabetes has not been shown in the long run even though it is more effective than stomach surgery. Contrary to what Gastric Bypass surgery is contemplated, it is not an absorbing surgery. The length of the small intestine bypassed is only 50 - 70 cm. The gut length to be bypassed must be much greater than this to create an impairment. While the small intestine between the small stomach pouch and the small intestine formed at the beginning of RNY bypass is 2.5 cm in diameter, it increases over 4 cm in 2 - 3 years, and the effect of reducing food intake is lost. This leads to weight gain.

The biggest problem with RNY Bypass is that it starts at this point, and in case of weight gain, another method revision is technically very difficult. Perhaps the single and most effective advantage of RNY Bypass surgery is the reduction of reflux disease, and sometimes the near-complete improvement. RNY gastric bypass may be an effective solution in the presence of persistent reflux disease after tubal stomach surgery.